The Challenge In Depth:
The CISO of this significant financial services company needed to prepare an annual cybersecurity budget, as requested by his BoD. The company’s rapid growth in the past year led to a significant increase in employee headcount and the number of endpoints that needed securing.
After reviewing the organization’s additional security needs, including increased employee training, pen-testing, better-advanced threat detection, and a major SOAR upgrade, the CISO calculated that a 15% increase over the previous year’s security budget was needed.
However, convincing the board to approve that budget would be difficult. The company was dedicated to cutting overall spending after two-quarters of slow growth and a decrease in annual profits. They were planning to demand the CISO cut his budget, delay all but the most crucial upgrades, and reduce spending wherever possible.
The CISO’s budget planning process was arduous, relying on outdated spreadsheets that required significant manual updating. There was no straightforward way to compare different budget and planning options or show the ripple effect that any cut or addition would have on the organization’s overall security posture. The CISO knew that the budget he presented contained a bit too much guesswork and gut instinct about what measures would be the most effective for the organization’s cybersecurity needs.
Communication with the board posed its own set of hurdles. The technical language used in the tall stack of cybersecurity reports and analyst assessments often proved too technical for board members to grasp easily and quickly. The CISO lacked a straightforward way to explain how increased cybersecurity vulnerability translated directly to increased business risk, which threatened to damage their bottom-line profits in the next year.
Without clear metrics to quantify the risk reduction associated with increasing the budget, convincing the board of the necessity for substantial investments in new cybersecurity measures would be difficult.