Critical infrastructure
Regulated, high consequence
NIS2 and sector regulation tracked alongside internal maturity, with OT and IT reconciled into one position rather than reviewed separately.
Sage / Solutions
Four functions reading the same live model.
Exposure management, compliance and planning run on the same underlying data, surfaced for whoever has to act on it. Nobody rebuilds the picture to suit their own meeting.
For CISOs
What to fund next, and the reasoning the model used.
The program position across every entity, the sequence Sage recommends, and the weighting that produced it. When a priority is challenged, the inputs behind it are on the same screen.
- One reconciled view across every entity and region
- Investment sequenced by impact, with the reasoning attached
- Budget scenarios modeled before the number is committed
Program maturity
3.4
+0.4 this quarter
Entities tracked
7
4 regions
For GRC & compliance
Evidence captured continuously, not reconstructed before an audit.
Six standards run against a single control library, which means an overlapping requirement is evidenced once. Each control resolves to the artifact that satisfied it and the date it was captured.
- Six frameworks tracked in parallel, one control library
- Overlapping requirements satisfied once, not once per audit
- Evidence packs exported on demand with a full trail
Framework readiness
For security operations
One prioritized backlog, shared with leadership.
Engineering works the same order leadership is looking at. One priority list, and no weekly negotiation about sequence.
- Two-way sync with Jira, ServiceNow and Azure DevOps
- Each ticket carries its control, framework clause and risk weight
- Closure updates maturity automatically, no status meeting
01SAGE-412 Privileged access reviewAssigned · IAM team · due Sep 12Critical
02SAGE-418 OT endpoint coverageIn progress · 62% completeHigh
03SAGE-421 Vendor reassessment batchQueued · 46 vendorsHigh
For board & audit
A quarterly view with the math behind it.
Movement, spend and residual risk presented the same way every quarter, which keeps periods and business units comparable. Each figure resolves to the record that produced it.
- Movement against last quarter, not a fresh narrative each time
- Investment shown next to the outcome it produced
- Board-standard PDF and deck exports
Maturity
3.4
+0.4 vs. Q2
Spend to plan
86%
FY26
Open critical
2
down from 6
By sector
How the model applies across sectors.
Enterprise
Multi-entity, multi-framework
Entity-level comparison across business units and regions, with overlapping frameworks resolved to one control library.
Industrials
OT alongside IT
Plant and production environments scored on the same model as corporate systems, with coverage gaps ranked by the exposure they leave open.
Healthcare
Patient data under continuous audit
Evidence for HIPAA and ISO 27001 collected once and reused, with remediation ranked by residual exposure rather than audit date.
Which of these is your remit?
Tell us the role and we will shape the walkthrough around it.